一加 5 智能手机简短评测计算的艺术家。一加 5 是一台质优价廉的智能手机——虽然没有原本那么便宜，但运算速度提升了。这台带双摄像头、AMOLED 屏幕，以及轻薄机身的手机能否保持在高端市场的一席之地？在我们的测评中寻找答案吧。
更新：新固件，让4k摄像更具稳定性。 Florian Wimmer, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 08/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇮🇹 🇭🇺 🇪🇸 🇳🇱 🇵🇹 🇫🇷 Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
OnePlus 5 (5 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.45 GHz, Kryo 280Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 540Memory6 GB Display5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yesStorage64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB , 52.67 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: fingerpring, hall, acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, RGB ambient light, compass, Sensor HubNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1700/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 7.25 x 154.2 x 74.1Battery12.5 Wh, 3300 mAh Lithium-Ion, Dash ChargeOperating SystemAndroid 7.1 NougatCameraPrimary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.6, 36mm, phase detection auto focus + 16 MP, f/1.7, 24mm, EIS (gyro), 1.6x optial zoom, dual LED flashSecondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 20mm, EIS (gyro), 1.0 µm pixel sizeAdditional featuresSpeakers: mono speaker on bottom edge, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, QuickCharge, USB cable, SIM tool, OnePlus Community, 24 Months Warranty, SAR values: 1.240W/kg (head), 0.850W/kg (body); bandwidth (download/upload): 600Mbps/150Mbps (LTE), fanlessWeight153 g, Power Supply: 78 g
Price499 EuroLinksOnePlus homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Honor 8 Pro OnePlus 5 OnePlus 3T Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Galaxy S8 DIN A6 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Samsung Galaxy S8Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500)
651 MBit/s +21%OnePlus 5Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
539 MBit/s Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s -38%OnePlus 3TAdreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s -42%Honor 8 ProMali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
233 MBit/s -57% iperf3 receive AX12OnePlus 5Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
371 MBit/s Samsung Galaxy S8Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500)
329 MBit/s -11%Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeMali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s -24%OnePlus 3TAdreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s -31%Honor 8 ProMali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
236 MBit/s -36%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - bridge
GPS OnePlus 5 - overview
GPS OnePlus 5 - junction
GPS OnePlus 5 - bridge
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesOnePlus 5Samsung Galaxy S8+Huawei Mate 9Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 5Samsung Galaxy S8+Huawei Mate 9Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesOnePlus 5Samsung Galaxy S8+Huawei Mate 9Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
420cd/m²431cd/m²451cd/m²420cd/m²426cd/m²444cd/m²423cd/m²425cd/m²442cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 451 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 431.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.08 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %Center on Battery: 426 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}Gamma: 2.25CCT: 6329 K
OnePlus 5AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"OnePlus 3TOptic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"Samsung Galaxy S8Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"Apple iPhone 7 PlusIPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"Honor 8 ProIPS, 2560x1440, 5.7"Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeSuper AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"Screen-155%-20%21%-45%14%Brightness middle426421 -1%566 33%557 31%541 27%554 30%Brightness431430 0%564 31%553 28%514 19%552 28%Brightness Distribution9384 -10%94 1%97 4%91 -2%96 3%Black Level *0.350.3Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.67.1 -344%2.7 -69%1.4 12%3.2 -100%1.59 1%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.115.3 -273%5.4 -32%3.1 24%7.2 -76%2.56 38%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.76.8 -300%3.1 -82%1.3 24%4 -135%2.01 -18%Gamma2.25 98%2.23 99%2.15 102%2.21 100%2.27 97%2.01 109%CCT6329 103%7866 83%6335 103%6667 97%7120 91%6321 103%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)81.5763.182.12Color Space (Percent of sRGB)99.8799.8399.98Contrast15911803* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 HzThe display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise↘ 2 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise↘ 2.8 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Lightmark | Basemark X 1.1 | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal | Epic Citadel AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 5
177156 Points OnePlus 3T
159866 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S8
171884 Points -3%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points -7%Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points -27%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points -2%HTC U11
175032 Points -1%PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
7826 Points OnePlus 3T
5664 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points -23%Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -40%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points -2%HTC U11
8295 Points +6% Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
6579 Points Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points -18%Honor 8 Pro
6134 Points -7%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points -2%HTC U11
6828 Points +4%BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)OnePlus 5
3790 Points OnePlus 3T
2218 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points -14%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points -18%Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points -45%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points -7%HTC U11
3034 Points -20% System (sort by value)OnePlus 5
5902 Points OnePlus 3T
3130 Points -47%Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points -9%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +12%Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points -32%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points -31%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points -1%HTC U11
5570 Points -6% Memory (sort by value)OnePlus 5
4423 Points OnePlus 3T
1954 Points -56%Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points -31%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points -70%Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points -53%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points -22%HTC U11
2085 Points -53% Graphics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
6144 Points OnePlus 3T
4444 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points -1%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +12%Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -64%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points -2%HTC U11
5976 Points -3% Web (sort by value)OnePlus 5
1287 Points OnePlus 3T
891 Points -31%Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points -10%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +20%Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points -23%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points -4%HTC U11
1221 Points -5%Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
1973 Points Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points +1%Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points -6%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points -3%HTC U11
1906 Points -3% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
6799 Points Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points -1%Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points -8%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points -5%HTC U11
6443 Points -5% Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
8005 Points Samsung Galaxy S8
8490 Points +6%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points -2%HTC U11
8281 Points +3%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
40229 Points OnePlus 3T
30810 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points -22%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points -6%Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points -36%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points -29%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points -20%HTC U11
40014 Points -1%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)OnePlus 5
58001 Points OnePlus 3T
34494 Points -41%Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points -37%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points +9%Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points -44%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points -43%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points -10%HTC U11
55725 Points -4%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
19411 Points OnePlus 3T
22426 Points +16%Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points +11%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points -19%Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points +1%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points -29%HTC U11
20140 Points +4%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)OnePlus 5
4219 Points OnePlus 3T
2577 Points -39%Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points -5%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points -28%Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points -56%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points -36%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points -19%HTC U11
4744 Points +12%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
4765 Points OnePlus 3T
3310 Points -31%Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points +3%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points -11%Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points -61%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points -37%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points +7%HTC U11
5877 Points +23%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
3012 Points OnePlus 3T
1452 Points -52%Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points -19%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points -49%Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points -37%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points -34%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points -48%HTC U11
2832 Points -6%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)OnePlus 5
3566 Points OnePlus 3T
2221 Points -38%Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points -10%Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points -49%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points -38%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points -19%HTC U11
3590 Points +1%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
3757 Points OnePlus 3T
2418 Points -36%Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points -8%Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points -54%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points -41%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points -1%HTC U11
3883 Points +3%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)OnePlus 5
3026 Points OnePlus 3T
1728 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points -18%Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points -30%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points -46%HTC U11
2841 Points -6%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
60 fps OnePlus 3T
59 fps -2%Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps 0%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps -4%Honor 8 Pro
59 fps -2%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps -15%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps 0%HTC U11
58 fps -3%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
115 fps OnePlus 3T
91 fps -21%Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps +5%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps -20%Honor 8 Pro
43 fps -63%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps -30%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps -5%HTC U11
91 fps -21%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)OnePlus 5
56 fps OnePlus 3T
45 fps -20%Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps -27%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps -1%Honor 8 Pro
20 fps -64%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps -52%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps -18%HTC U11
29 fps -48%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
61 fps OnePlus 3T
46 fps -25%Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps +2%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps -4%Honor 8 Pro
29 fps -52%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps -38%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps -23%HTC U11
51 fps -16%GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
41 fps OnePlus 3T
32 fps -22%Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps -44%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps +1%Honor 8 Pro
13 fps -68%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -63%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps -10%HTC U11
15 fps -63%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
42 fps OnePlus 3T
32 fps -24%Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps -43%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps -2%Honor 8 Pro
21 fps -50%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps -33%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps -17%HTC U11
33 fps -21%GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
25 fps OnePlus 3T
20 fps -20%Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps -48%Honor 8 Pro
11 fps -56%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps -68%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps 0%HTC U11
13 fps -48%1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)OnePlus 5
25 fps OnePlus 3T
20 fps -20%Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps 0%Honor 8 Pro
15 fps -40%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -40%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps -8%HTC U11
24 fps -4%Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
30.64 fps Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps HTC U11
36.58 fps Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S8
43852 Points Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points HTC U11
44696 Points High Quality (sort by value)Samsung Galaxy S8
42183 Points Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points HTC U11
38752 Points Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
1276 Points Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points HTC U11
812 Points Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8
59.8 fps Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
60 fps HTC U11
60 fps Legend
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015 JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.1 Points +135%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points +5%OnePlus 5
71.6 Points HTC U11
69.5 Points -3%Samsung Galaxy S8
65.8 Points -8%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
61.5 Points -14%Honor 8 Pro
58.1 Points -19%OnePlus 3T
54.5 Points -24%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points +118%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points +10%Samsung Galaxy S8
12941 Points +8%OnePlus 5
11945 Points HTC U11
11781 Points -1%Sony Xperia XZ Premium
10672 Points -11%Honor 8 Pro
10016 Points -16%OnePlus 3T
9798 Points -18%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3199 ms * -22%Honor 8 Pro
3157 ms * -20%HTC U11
2760 ms * -5%OnePlus 3T
2719 ms * -4%OnePlus 5
2622 ms * Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * +2%Samsung Galaxy S8
1887 ms * +28%Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * +58%WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points +27%Samsung Galaxy S8
194 Points +20%Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points +1%HTC U11
162 Points +1%OnePlus 5
161 Points Sony Xperia XZ Premium
149 Points -7%Honor 8 Pro
141 Points -12%OnePlus 3T
135 Points -16%* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 5OnePlus 3TSamsung Galaxy S8Honor 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S7 EdgeSony Xperia XZ PremiumHTC U11AndroBench 3-553%-7%174%-30%-18%70% Sequential Read 256KB748436.4 -42%793 6%738 -1%487.3 -35%687 -8%717 -4% Sequential Write 256KB201.5165.3 -18%193.2 -4%187.1 -7%145.1 -28%194 -4%206.4 2% Random Read 4KB141123.6 -12%127.2 -10%166.4 18%86.7 -39%74.1 -47%91.4 -35% Random Write 4KB19.374.4 285%15.25 -21%151.6 685%15.79 -18%17.2 -11%80 315% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard63.954.276.436.7968.8 Sequential Write 256KB SDCard53.532.1650.433.3146.25
Asphalt 8: Airborne SettingsValue high30 fps very low30 fps
... in comparison
Dead Trigger 2 SettingsValue high60 fps
... in comparison
Max. LoadIdle
37.6 °C37.3 °C33.2 °C 37.6 °C37.5 °C33.1 °C 36.9 °C36.7 °C33.1 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °CAverage: 35.9 °C
32.5 °C34.1 °C35.1 °C32.8 °C34 °C35.6 °C32.4 °C34.5 °C35.8 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °CAverage: 34.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 31.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.3 °C27.9 °C26.9 °C 27.8 °C27.1 °C27.4 °C 27.6 °C27.9 °C27.1 °C
Maximum: 27.9 °CAverage: 27.4 °C
26.5 °C26.7 °C26.6 °C26.7 °C26.5 °C26.8 °C26.5 °C26.5 °C26.7 °C
Maximum: 26.8 °CAverage: 26.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 5 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)Compared to same class» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.03 / 0.28 WattIdle 0.73 / 1.44 / 1.5 Watt
Load
6.91 / 8.51 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 53300 mAhOnePlus 3T3400 mAhSamsung Galaxy S83000 mAhApple iPhone 7 Plus2915 mAhHonor 8 Pro4000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge3600 mAhPower Consumption-11%24%-13%-33%14%Idle Minimum *0.730.61 16%0.78 -7%0.77 -5%0.98 -34%0.63 14%Idle Average *1.441.77 -23%1.1 24%2.04 -42%2.27 -58%1.1 24%Idle Maximum *1.51.81 -21%1.16 23%2.24 -49%2.36 -57%1.56 -4%Load Average *6.916.67 3%4.15 40%4.69 32%6.58 5%5.95 14%Load Maximum *8.5110.98 -29%5.12 40%8.66 -2%10.12 -19%6.7 21%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 07min
OnePlus 53300 mAhOnePlus 3T3400 mAhSamsung Galaxy S83000 mAhApple iPhone 7 Plus2915 mAhHonor 8 Pro4000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge3600 mAhBattery Runtime8%20%14%-5%39%Reader / Idle15341423 -7%1667 9%1835 20%1378 -10%1663 8%H.264623810 30%771 24%813 30%675 8%914 47%WiFi v1.3518494 -5%719 39%587 13%573 11%732 41%Load247282 14%264 7%225 -9%181 -27%392 59%
Pros+ 创新、轻薄、非常坚固的机身
+ 双SIM卡
+ 支持多LTE频率
+ 良好的语音质量
+ 很好地增强了Android
+ 没有多余的应用程序
+ 非常快的充电时间
+ 精确的GPS
+ OLED屏幕具有准确的颜色
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 很好的性能
+ 扬声器音量大
+ 能耗低
+ 实际的电池运行时间
+ 良好的自拍相机Cons- 主相机质量不属于高端水平
- 在长时间的负荷下会发热
- 重负荷时节流
- 滚动时，果冻效应
- 为视频互换话筒通道
- 仅有USB 2.0
- 没有microSD插槽
- 外壳不是防水或防尘
Review: OnePlus 5在对一加 5进行评测后，我们发现了许多值得被讨论的问题。让我们开始吧：
一加 5是“旗舰机杀手”吗？这其实取决于你对旗舰机的期待。该设备的确能跟上更为昂贵的机器的性能，但是，一加 5在自身性能上的提升却显得不足。该设备拥有许多功能，但是它不支持无线充电、快速USB接口以及更高分辨率的屏幕。同时，摄像头也没能跟上高端智能机的水准。
老用户是否有必要换新机？ 如果你已经拥有 一加 2 或者更老版本设备，换新机，你的确能获得更好性能、且更新后的系统以及更薄的机身。一加 3 or 3T 则情况有所不同。鉴于没有多少变化，我们认为：换新机不是很值得。
一加 5依然物美价廉吗？ 是的，一加 5以相对低的价格提供了较高的性能能。但是，它现在的价格却有了更多的竞争对手，比如说: 荣耀 8 Pro ，或者一些去年的机型，例如： 三星 Galaxy S7 Edge。价格299美元的 一加 1 无疑是最便宜的智能手机，而一加 5，其价格在530美元，也算不错，但是不是很有竞争力。
一加5给我们什么样的整体印象呢？第一年的兴奋已经明显地消失了。其中一个原因是错误安装的屏幕导致了果冻效应，同时存在这紧急呼叫的错误。在新的溢价下，这些问题可能不会那么容易被接受。同时，制造商通常对于任何检测到的缺陷都会做出快速的示范性回应：对于紧急呼叫的错误，他们都会在几天之内提供更新。他们至少也回应了我们关于难以理解基准数据的评论，并且开放交流。撇开所有问题：一加 5在性价比方面几乎没有竞争对手。不变的Android系统、创新的插件、众多的配件、具有特殊电影风格的色彩空间的屏幕和双SIM卡更是其独特的卖点。
一加 5是拥有旗舰机质量的价格相对便宜的智能手机。虽然对照相质量的提升很小，但是在其他方面却做的不错：性能，屏幕，外壳和通话质量。
一加 5并不完美，但价格不错，而且仍然是非常好的旗舰机。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
OnePlus 5
- 07/25/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Chassis91%
Keyboard69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device95%
Connectivity48 / 60 → 80%
Weight92%
Battery91%
Display90%
Games Performance65 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance61 / 70 → 87%
Temperature92%
Noise100%
Audio67 / 91 → 74%
Camera80%
Average80%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceOnePlus 5 (5 Series)
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!
！